Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co. v. Shea
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Palo Alto Circuit Court. Action to enjoin the collection of taxes voted in aid of the Cedar Rapids, Iowa Falls & Northwestern Railroad Company. A part of the relief asked by the plaintiff was refused, and both parties appeal, but the plaintiff under the statute must be regarded as the appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
Taxes were voted in six townships in aid of the Cedar Rapids, Iowa Falls & Northwestern Railway Company, and in five of the townships the district court held that the taxes were valid, and as to them the petition was dismissed on the merits. In Lost Island township the court held the taxes to be invalid, and the relief asked by plaintiff as to said taxes was granted. The plaintiff’s appeal will be first' considered, and it can be more intelligently done by determining in the order presented by counsel the several objections urged against the validity of the taxes.
í taxation roads^con^1" of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stewart v. Bd. of Super. of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Ryan v. VargaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Muscatine Western R. R. v. HortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Manning v. MathewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Phillips & Son v. BothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Curran v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Tobin & Neary v. HartshornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Johnson v. Incorporated Town of RemsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Smith v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.