Legal Opinion

Cohn v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 17, 1912No. 867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7330 (T. D. 32281).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case was imported under the tariff act of 1909, and consists of certain brooches, lavalieres, and earrings.

The collector held them to be dutiable at cumulative rates equal to 85 per cent ád valorem, under the first provisions of paragraph'488 of the act,, as earrings and brooches "composed in chief value of brass, plated, and set with imitation precious stones, * * * designed to be worn on apparel or attached to the person, * * * commonly known as jewelry and valued at over 20 cents per dozen • pieces.”

The importers protested against this assessment, claiming,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Germania Importing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. United States v. Klytia Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API