Legal Opinion

People v. Cass

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2012PublishedCited by 180 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

The primary issue we address is whether the trial court properly admitted evidence of defendant’s uncharged murder to rebut defendant’s extreme emotional disturbance defense concerning the murder for which he was on trial. Although we have considered the use of Molineux evidence (People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 [1901]) to rebut a defense predicated on a *556defendant’s impaired state of mind in other contexts (see e.g. People v Santarelli, 49 NY2d 241 [1980] [legal insanity defense]), this appeal presents the first opportunity for the Court to address the use of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by180 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. The People v. Christopher A. NicholsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. The People v.Raymond DensonNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. The People v. Lawrence P. FrumusaNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. The People v. Richard M. LeonardNew York Court of Appeals · 2017

175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API