People v. Cass
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jones, J.
The primary issue we address is whether the trial court properly admitted evidence of defendant’s uncharged murder to rebut defendant’s extreme emotional disturbance defense concerning the murder for which he was on trial. Although we have considered the use of Molineux evidence (People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 [1901]) to rebut a defense predicated on a *556defendant’s impaired state of mind in other contexts (see e.g. People v Santarelli, 49 NY2d 241 [1980] [legal insanity defense]), this appeal presents the first opportunity for the Court to address the use of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by180 opinions
- People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- The People v. Christopher A. NicholsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- The People v.Raymond DensonNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- The People v. Lawrence P. FrumusaNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- The People v. Richard M. LeonardNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.