Marriage of Murray v. Murray

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Respondent moved the trial court for an upward adjustment of appellant’s child support obligations. The trial court granted the motion and denied appellant’s subsequent motion to terminate maintenance. We affirm.

FACTS

The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1983 per stipulations approved by the court. The parties have two children. Appellant James Murray paid respondent Kim Murray $100 a month in maintenance and $250 per month in child support. At that time, Minnesota’s child support guidelines, Minn.Stat. § 518.551 (1983), provided for over $500 per month child support…