Legal Opinion

Treverton v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 3, 1993No. A8907-04065; CA A68862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Plaintiffs civil action against defendant was referred to arbitration pursuant to ORS 36.400 et seq. The arbitrator held defendant in default as a sanction for a discovery violation and awarded damages and attorney fees to plaintiff on the merits of the dispute. Defendant appealed to circuit court for a de novo jury trial pursuant to ORS 36.425(2)(a). Plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that defendant’s default in the arbitration proceeding foreclosed him from pursuing the appeal to circuit court. The trial court denied the motion. The jury awarded plaintiff a lesser amount of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howser v. BEN DIERKS LUMBER CO., INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Main Street Asset Corp. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Krause v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Gage v. All Nations InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Gage v. All Nations InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monroe v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Lee v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Department of Human Services v. J. R. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API