Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Department of Human Services v. J. R. D.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 7, 2017No. 16JU03467; Petition Number 111727; A162808Published

1ConcurrenceDehoog, J.

In this case, DHS served mother with a juvenile dependency petition and a summons requiring her to personally appear in court on June 6, 2016, at 10:45 a.m., to admit or deny the allegations of the petition. As ORS 419B.815(4) requires, the summons told mother that “appearing] personally” did not mean having her attorney appear for her,1 and that, if she failed to appear in person as required, “the court may establish jurisdiction without further notice either on the date specified in the summons” or on some later date.2

Mother did not appear personally as required. Instead, at approximately…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. S. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Monroe v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Treverton v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API