Legal Opinion

Houston v. Integrand Assurance Company

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided January 13, 2021No. 3:17-cv-01247Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2 NAOMI PATRICE HOUSTON, 3 Plaintiff, 4 v. 5 CIVIL NO. 17-1247 (GAG) FROG’S REST., LLC; et al., 6 Defendants. 7 OPINION AND ORDER 8 Frog’s Restaurants, LLC (“Señor Frog”), and Integrand Assurance Co. (“Integrand”) 9 (collectively “Defendants”) move for summary judgment against Naomi Patrice Houston (“Plaintiff” 10 or “Ms. Houston”) alleging that Plaintiff’s claim lacks two necessary elements—a negligent act or 11 omission and a causal relation—to prevail under the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s general tort 12 statute, P.R. LAWS ANN. tit.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Iverson v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API