Houston v. Integrand Assurance Company
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2 NAOMI PATRICE HOUSTON, 3 Plaintiff, 4 v. 5 CIVIL NO. 17-1247 (GAG) FROG’S REST., LLC; et al., 6 Defendants. 7 OPINION AND ORDER 8 Frog’s Restaurants, LLC (“Señor Frog”), and Integrand Assurance Co. (“Integrand”) 9 (collectively “Defendants”) move for summary judgment against Naomi Patrice Houston (“Plaintiff” 10 or “Ms. Houston”) alleging that Plaintiff’s claim lacks two necessary elements—a negligent act or 11 omission and a causal relation—to prevail under the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s general tort 12 statute, P.R. LAWS ANN. tit.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Iverson v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.