Legal Opinion

Brady v. Ball

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1860PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

-Worden,

J.—Suit by the appellee against the to recover damages for injury done by trespassing animals. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, a new trial being denied. The material facts are as follows: A lot of cattle belonging jointly to the defendants and one Jefferson D. Brady were being pastured by their owners in a field belonging to one Stockton. They broke through the partition fence between the field of Stockton and the premises of Robert Foresman, and entered the latter, thence through the partition fence between Foresman!s premises and the plaintiff’s wheat-field, and thence into…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. BainakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Thompson v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Wm. Tackaberry Co. v. Sioux City Service Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Cook v. MoreaIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Reddick v. NewburnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API