Legal Opinion
O'Neil v. Vie
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 27, 1923No. 12334PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
FOSTER, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of Pitts-burg county, Olcla., on the 17th day of December, 1919, by L. G. Yie, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against Arthur L. Mills, receiver of the Fort Smith & Western Railroad, plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover • the sum of $8,000 for ai-, leged personal injuries caused by the negligence of the railroad company. By stipulation of counsel since the appeal has been' lodged in this court, Charles T. O’Neal, receiver of the Fort Smith & Western Rail-' road, has been substituted as plaintiff in error in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Minneapolis v. LundinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrazzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. GraneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Prest-O-Lite Co., Inc. v. HowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. KennardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.