City of Minneapolis v. Lundin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the 'Circuit Court of tbe United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The city of Minneapolis, the plaintiff in error, seeks to reverse the judgment against it recovered in the court below by Ericlc Lundin, the defendant in error, on the ground that the circuit court should have instructed the jury to return a verdict in its favor.
The charter of the city of Minneapolis provides that the city engineer ‘‘shall have supervision and general charge of all work done for the city, and all work done in any street, highway or alley in the city; may direct the manner of performing such work, and the construction of all sidewalks, street crossings,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Armour v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- American Bridge Co. v. SeedsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Finalyson v. Utica Mining & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Tanner v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.