Maddox v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Joshua Maddox v. State of Maryland, No. 990 and 996, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Zarnoch, J. STATUTES – STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – CONSEQUENCES In construing a statute, the court may “consider the consequences resulting from one meaning rather than another, and adopt that construction which avoids an illogical or unreasonable result, or one which is inconsistent with common sense.” Gomez v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.,
427 Md. 128, 158-59
(2012) (quoting Tucker v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co.,
308 Md. 69, 75
(1986)). CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – EXTENSION OF PROBATION FOR RESTITUTION…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Gomez v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Blaine v. BlaineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of S.G.-H.M. Jr., A Youth.Montana Supreme Court · 2021
- In re: Expungement Petition of Richard M.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Wharton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026