Legal Opinion
Perkins & Mario, P.C. v. Annunziata
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 20, 1997No. AC 15878PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The plaintiff, Perkins & Mario, P.C., appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its application to modify, correct or vacate an arbitration award in favor of the defendant, Albert R. Annunziata.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly dismissed its application because (1) the award of fees to a discharged attorney who handled a *238personal injury matter on a contingency fee basis and had no written fee agreement is against public policy, (2) the arbitrators exceeded their power and acted contrary to law, and (3) one of the arbitrators had a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Carroll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- City of Hartford v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 760Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Sands v. Menard, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Rocky Hill Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.