Legal Opinion

In re Standard Gas & Electric Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 30, 1954No. Civ. Nos. 489, 1497PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

The law firms of Guggenheimer & Untermyer, Guggenheimer, Untermyer, Goodrich & Amram, and Connolly, Cooch & Bove have filed a motion for leave to file application for compensation and reimbursement of expenses in connection with reorganization of the Standard Gas And Electric Company, et al., pursuant to § 11(e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79k(e).

There are fee proceedings currently pending before the SEC with respect to claims of these applicants and several others and these proceedings represent the last stages of the § 11(e) reorganization…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Kaus v. HustonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1940
  5. Powell v. KnightDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Albert L. Shipley, Jr. And Evelyn Needham, Formerly Shipley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Abbott v. Delaware State Public Integrity CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018
  3. In re Standard Gas & Electric Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API