Legal Opinion

Lamar v. Marbury

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1982No. 81-271PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The brief of appellant fails to set forth a proposition of law as required by Section 1(D), Rule V of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, but does contain an “assignment of error” to which we confine our review. The assignment of error reads as follows: “The Court of Appeals erred in finding that the trial court’s ruling allowing the appeal and trial de novo pursuant to an oral motion under Civil Rule 60 B is an appealable order.”

In support, appellant argues a reversal of the judgment of the Court of Appeals essentially upon the basis that it must be assumed from the record that an…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Blosser v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Kahler v. EytchesonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. BooherOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Shirley v. Kruse, Unpublished Decision (1-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Boston v. DaughertyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API