Legal Opinion

Brickman & Sons, Inc. v. National City Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2005No. 2004-0819PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} Today this court must decide whether a transfer is proper when an administrative judge’s entry of reassignment under authority of the Rules of Superintendence does not state the reason for the transfer, but the reason is clear from the record. For the reasons that follow, we answer in the affirmative and, therefore, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 2} This case involves a rancorous family dispute that has generated three lawsuits since 2001. At the center of the dispute are plaintiff-appellee Brickman & Sons, Inc. (“the company”) and a trust created by its sole…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Berger v. BergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Durrani v. Ruehlman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Dean v. Liberty Mut. Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Mun. Constr. Equip. Operators' Labor Council v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Myers v. Lemay (In re Kiger)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. TorrestoroOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API