Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. G&K, LLC

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided June 27, 2005No. 0003660Published

1Opinion of the Court

White, Catherine A., J.

Pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56, the parties in the present case move for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the parties’ motions are DENIED.

BACKGROUND

The undisputed facts are as follows. G&K, LLC (“G&K”) was the owner of a building at 200 Boylston Street (“the Building”), which it leased as office and retail space. The Building is a four-story commercial building with three stories above-ground and a basement. Sidney Kriensky was a manager for G&K and had an office in the Building.

In 1999, G&K entered into a lease with RPR Restaurant Group, Inc. (“RPR”). RPR…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API