Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Harlan
The Court’s opinion in these appeals, and some of the things said in Construction Laborers v. Curry, ante, p. 542, cut deeply into the statutory requirement of “finality” limiting our jurisdiction to review state court judgments.1
That requirement is more than a technical rule of jsrocedure, yielding when need be to the exigencies of particular situations. Rather, it is a long-standing and healthy federal policy that protects litigants and courts from the disruptions of piecemeal review and forecloses this Court from passing on constitutional issues that may be dissipated by the final outcome…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Radio Station Wow, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.