Legal Opinion

United States v. Strohmeyer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 21, 1915No. 1466PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36458 (T. D. 34763).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Paragraph 81 of the tariff act of October 3, 1913, so far as material to the issues here, provides as follows:

81. Earthy or mineral substances wholly or partially manufactured and articles and wares composed wholly or in chief value of earthy or mineral substances, not specially provided for in this section, whether susceptible of decoration or not, if not decorated in any manner, twenty per centum ad valorem;.if decorated,' twenty-five per centum ad valorem; * * *.

Excepting the words in the first part of the paragraph, “earthy or mineral substances wholly or partially manufactured and,” this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Embossing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Bancel v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Kelley Hardware Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. Duluth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API