Legal Opinion
Allan v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 12, 2005No. 03 Civ. 6255(RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants the City of New York (the “City”), the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), New York City Police Officers Edwin Nieves (“Nieves”) and John Doe have moved under Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint of plain tiff Samantha Allan (“Allan”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. Furthermore, the Court, on its own initiative, dismisses the complaint as to Nieves for failure of service.
Prior Proceedings
Allan filed her complaint on August 19, 2003 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1 claiming, inter alia,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moglia v. King Marine, Inc. (In Re Outboard Marine Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Besedin v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Mena v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Morales v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020