Sopp v. Gehrlein
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, District Judge.
In the complaint filed in this civil action, the averments are undistinguishable from those alleged in the complaint filed at C.A. 1044 Erie, D.C., 232 F.Supp. 881. However, in this complaint nine individuals are named as defendants as well as the City of Erie, a municipal corporation in this district. In C.A. 1044, five individuals were named; and in the instant case, defendants Frederick R. Filburn and A. J. Harkins, United States Postal Inspectors, are added as defendants ; as is Richard \. Scarpitti, Assistant District Attorney of Erie County, Pennsylvania; and as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wheeldin v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Martucci v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Johnson v. CrumlishDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Sopp v. GehrleinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- National Refining Co. v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Margaret S. Rodriguez v. Donald E. RitcheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Gaito v. StraussDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Lee Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Williams v. Lehigh County Dept. of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.