Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Hotsenpiller
Indiana Supreme Court
From Randolph Circuit Court; W. O. Barnard, Special Judge. Action by Marcus Hotsenpiller against the Creamery Package Manufacturing Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.
— Appellant is a corporation engaged, at the city of Portland, Jay county, Indiana, in operating a plant for manufacturing butter-tubs, etc. *In its factory it had in operation a number of machines, one of which was denominated a “truss machine,” and was used for the purpose of equalizing the staves used in constructing butter-tubs. Appellee was an employe of appellant in its factory, and was engaged in operating the truss machine. His employment began some time in April, 1891, and in November following he, while engaged in operating the said truss machine, was severely injured, by reason of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cutter v. HamlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Mead v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Diamond Block Coal Co. v. CuthbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Hudelson v. HudelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.