Legal Opinion

Easterling v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 12, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner—

Affirming.

The appellant, whom we shall call the defendant, indicted under section 1166 of the statutes for malicious striking and wounding’ with intent to kill, was convicted1 of assault and battery, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300.00 and 60 days in jail.

Defendant asks a reversal because his demurrer to the indictment was overruled, his position being that this was erroneous because the words, “with a deadly weapon*” were not used in the accusatory part of the indictment, though they were used in the descriptive part. The strict common law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Merdith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Milburn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Caudill v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ray v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Roark v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Green v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. McKenzie v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API