Zorntlein v. Bram
The Superior Court of New York City
1Opinion of the CourtTruax, J.
This action was brought to partition the premises mentioned' in the complaint. I have found that in the year 1878 the premises were conveyed to Jacob Bram and Babeta Bram; that at the time of the making of said conveyance Babeta Bram was the wife of Jacob Bram, although that fact was not mentioned in the conveyance; that thereafter Babeta Bram conveyed one individual half of said premises to the plaintiff; that thereafter, and after the last mentioned deed had been recorded, said Jacob Bram and *241Babetta Bram conveyed said premises to the defendant, George Adam Bram, and that this last…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevens v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Whitney v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Meeker v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Wright v. . SaddlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Doe ex dem. De Peyster v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1828
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armondi v. DunhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- In re the Estate of BaffaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931