Legal Opinion

In re Cornell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 3, 1945No. 5105PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatfield, Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 22 and 25 to 32, inclusive, in appellants’ application (filed January 29, 1943) for the reissue of their patent (No. 2,302,529 issued November 17, 1942) for an invention relating to “a repeating valve shut-off system.”

Claim 22 is sufficiently illustrative of the appealed claims. It reads:

22. In a liquid dispensing apparatus of the class described comprising in combination a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re SmyserCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re OritaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Application of William O. WesselerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. In Re Michael P. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. In Re Sarah C. WatkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Conmed Corp. v. Ludlow Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API