Cotto v. United Technologies Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1ConcurrenceHennessy, J.
While I agree with the result reached by the majority, I disagree with the conclusion that General Statutes § 31-51q is applicable to speech on private property. I believe that the trial court properly held that § 31-51q does not apply and dismissed the plaintiffs complaint. Therefore, I respectfully concur in the judgment.
“[I]t is fundamental that the First Amendment [to the United States constitution] prohibits governmental infringement on the right of free speech. Similarly, the Fourteenth Amendment [to the United States constitution], which prohibits the states from denying federal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.