Legal Opinion

Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr. v. Aaron Campbell, Randy Mockler, Detective Stutsman, Sheldon B. Scott, and Steve Spadafora

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided December 22, 2025No. 3:18-cv-00899Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ENEDEO RODRIGUEZ, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO.: 3:18-CV-899-TLS-JEM AARON CAMPBELL, RANDY MOCKLER, DETECTIVE STUTSMAN, SHELDON B. SCOTT, and STEVE SPADAFORA, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr., a prisoner without a lawyer, commenced the instant action on November 5, 2018, by filing a Complaint [ECF No. 2] under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), and

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against multiple local and federal law enforcement defendants, claiming violations of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, a French Banking Corporation v. Cbi Industries, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API