Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Michigan State Democratic Party
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 10, 1984No. Civ. A. 84CV1096DTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On March 9, 1984, plaintiffs Jesse Jackson, Clyde Cleveland, Joel Ferguson, Rob ert Newby, Sam Riddle, Jr., and Kathleen Wilson filed their complaint in this action against defendants the Michigan State Democratic Party (State Party) and the Democratic Party of the United States (National Party). On the same date, plaintiffs filed a motion which requested that the court issue an order to show cause why injunctive relief should not be granted in accordance with their prayer for relief in the complaint.
On March 13, 1984, before…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heitmanis v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Burkholder v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- In re: R&W Clark Construction, Inc.; Chicago & Vicinity Laborers’ District Council Pension Plan; Chicago & Vicinity District Council Laborers’ Welfare Plan; Chicago & Vicinity District Council Retiree Welfare Plan; and Catherine Wenskus, not individually but as Administrator of the FundsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024