Maddox v. City of Birmingham
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
The accused was convicted in the circuit court on a charge of possessing lottery-tickets in violation of Section 600 of the 1944 General Code of the City of Birmingham.
There are a number of assignments of error; however under the rule we are required to consider only those that are stressed in brief of counsel. Simmons v. Cochran, 252 Ala. 461, 41 So.2d 579; Arrick v. Fanning, 35 Ala.App. 409, 47 So. 2d 708; Supreme Court Rule 10, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix.
Assignment number 4 is based on the action of the lower court in overruling appellant’s demurrers to the complaint.
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Woodson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Arrick v. FanningAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Simmons v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Lipscomb v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Brooks v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maddox v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Hulsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Wilson v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951