Legal Opinion

Maddox v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1950No. 6 Div. 15PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

The accused was convicted in the circuit court on a charge of possessing lottery-tickets in violation of Section 600 of the 1944 General Code of the City of Birmingham.

There are a number of assignments of error; however under the rule we are required to consider only those that are stressed in brief of counsel. Simmons v. Cochran, 252 Ala. 461, 41 So.2d 579; Arrick v. Fanning, 35 Ala.App. 409, 47 So. 2d 708; Supreme Court Rule 10, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix.

Assignment number 4 is based on the action of the lower court in overruling appellant’s demurrers to the complaint.

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Woodson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Arrick v. FanningAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Simmons v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Lipscomb v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Brooks v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maddox v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Hulsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Wilson v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API