Legal Opinion

Gengnagel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1988No. 694-86PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of indecent exposure. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 21.08. Punishment was assessed by the jury at a $1000 fine which was probated. On appeal to the Dallas Court of Appeals, appellant’s conviction was reversed and the information was dismissed. R_ M_ G_ v. State, 711 S.W.2d 397 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1986). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine the correctness of the Court of Appeals’ dual holding that the information was fundamentally defective and that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Townsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Arredondo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Cruz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Galliford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API