Legal Opinion
Arbib & Houlberg, Inc. v. Second Russian Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 3, 1923No. 36PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The. respondent is an insurance company organized and existing under the laws of Russia, and it is engaged in writing marine insurance in the city of New York, and on December 7, 1918, it made and delivered through its duly authorized agent at New York a policy of insurance upon a cargo of goatskins valued at $100,000 shipped on the steamship Shinkai Maru and rail at and from port and/or ports in India to New York, direct or otherwise, including transshipment if required. By the terms of the policy the respondent insured the libelant against all loss or damage to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- The FolminaSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Hazard's Administrator v. New England Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Pacific FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. The Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Continental Insurance v. Lone Eagle Shipping Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Borgemeister v. Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd.City of New York Municipal Court · 1926
- Hecht, Levis & Kahn, Inc. v. New Zealand Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Quinlivan v. Northwestern Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929