Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1939No. 2086PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Judgment was for the employ'ee. The insurance company appealed.

Appellant’s first contention is that the trial court erred in failing to grant its petition of removal to the Federal Court •on account of diversity of citizenship. In his original petition the plaintiff alleged total and permanent disability and sought ■a lump sum settlement on a basis of an average weekly wage of $18 for a period of 401 weeks. He did not allege specifically the amount of the recovery to which he was entitled, but, according to the facts ■alleged, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Stillman v. HirschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Blackmon v. TrailTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Wells v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Traders' & General Ins. Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Superior Ins. Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API