Legal Opinion

Lipscomb v. London Correctional Institute

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1994No. 93APE12-1755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteside, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by appellant, Larry Lipscomb, from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas dismissing his appeal from a decision of the State Personnel Board of Review affirming his dismissal from his employment at the London Correctional Institute. In support of his appeal, Lipscomb raises two assignments of error, as follows:

“1. The trial court erred in ruling that the State Personnel Board of Review’s administrative rule embodied in O.R.C. 119.12 was not a denial of procedural due process in that the rule requires a substantial security deposit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zier v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Geroc v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re TroianoOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Brown v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Queen City Terminals, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Your Financial Community of Ohio, Inc. v. EmerickOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Staffen v. Buckta, Unpublished Decision (4-8-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API