Legal Opinion

Padjen v. Shipley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1976No. 14453PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff initiated this action, seeking in-junctive relief against the adjoining property owner on the ground that defendant' was violating a zoning ordinance, Section 22-2-16, Rev.Ord. Salt Lake County, 1966. The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion *939for summary judgment and ordered the removal of a dog run within 40 feet of plaintiffs house. Defendant appeals. We reverse; and remand for dismissal of plaintiffs action. This for the reason the ordinance is not applicable.

Plaintiff alleged defendant kept and maintained two dogs in a pen or run which extended to within 18…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heathman v. GilesUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. W. S. Hatch Co. v. Public Service Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Schubach v. SilverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Verner v. RedmanArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cord Meyer Development Co. v. Bell Bay Drugs, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. B & W Management, Inc. v. Tasea Investment Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Johnson v. Hermes Associates, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Erickson v. SorensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Harper v. Summit CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  5. Culbertson v. Board of County CommissionersUtah Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API