Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1963No. 425-57PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

Plaintiff is one of a large number of railroads which banded together in the late 1940’s to buy the Pullman sleeping car business. As a result of a Government antitrust suit, Pullman, Inc., the parent company of the Pullman interests, was required in 1944 to divest itself of either its car manufacturing business or its sleeping car activities. It chose to retain the former and therefore approached various railroads to purchase the assets or stock of The Pullman Company, the subsidiary which operated the sleeping car business. The interested roads formed the Railroad Buying Group which worked…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Reinecke v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olaf C. Akland, and Bertha A. Akland v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Rosenberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API