Legal Opinion

Neil Huffman Volkswagen Corp. v. Ridolphi

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1979No. 78-203PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a jury verdict and judgment awarding damages of $27,500 to Earl D. Ridolphi, Jr., against Neil Huffman Volkswagen for a fraudulent and misrepresented sale of a 1974 Datsun 260Z automobile. We affirm.

In October, 1976, Ridolphi, a resident of Alabama, came to Montgomery during the course of his employment as a salesman for a Birmingham insurance firm. While he was in Montgomery, he went to Neil Huffman Volkswagen to purchase a sports car, because he wanted to impress his clients. He decided that the sports car he wanted was a 1974 Datsun 260Z. The price — $4,850,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Treadwell Ford, Inc. v. LeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. J. Truett Payne Company v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Camp v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  4. District 20, United Mine Workers of America v. SamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. First Alabama Bank Of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Dodd v. Nelda Stephenson Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. CECIL CREWS CHEV.-OLDS., INC. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API