Legal Opinion
Roling v. ETrade Securities LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 27, 2012No. C-10-0488 EMCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Joseph Roling and Alexander Landvater have filed a class action against E*Trade Securities, LLC, asserting that it unlawfully charged and collected account inactivity fees — also known as account maintenance fees (“AMFs”) or account service fees (“ASFs”) — from its customers. Currently pending before the Court is E*Trade’s renewed motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (“SAC”). E*Trade’s motion deals with Plaintiffs’ claims as individuals only as there has been…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Martin v. Alamo Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pagaduan v. Carnival Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Barot v. St. John's UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- LAREMORE v. HOLIDAY CVS, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021