Legal Opinion
Riley v. Lance, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 20, 2008No. 06-3697PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Charles Riley appeals from the order of the District Court 1 granting summary judgment to Lance, Inc., on Riley’s claim of age discrimination. We affirm.
We review the decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the District Court. We view the facts in the light most favorable to Riley, and we will affirm if we conclude there remain no genuine issues of material fact and Lance is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Arnold v. Nursing & Rehab. Ctr. at Good Shepherd, LLC, 471 F.3d 843, 845 (8th Cir.2006). The record shows the following…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Willie Johnson v. Ready Mixed Concrete Co., a Nebraska Corporation and Division of Lyman-Richey Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Marvin L. Fisher v. Pharmacia & UpjohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lake v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property ImprovementCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Haigh v. Gelita USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Elam v. Regions Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Orsak v. Metropolitan Airports Commission Airport Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.