State v. Moen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*89WARREN, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of contempt of court for failure to obey a duly served subpoena.1 Defendant’s only contention on appeal is that the trial court’s authority to punish him for contempt is, under the facts, limited to a fine not exceeding $100. We agree and reverse.
On March 16,1986, defendant was served a subpoena to appear before a grand jury on March 20. On March 19,1986, the state obtained a warrant authorizing the search of defendant’s person. On March 20, defendant failed to appear before the grand jury. On that day, an order was issued…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- STATE Ex Rel OREGON STATE BAR v. LENSKEOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Spencer v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weldon v. Board of Licensed Professional Counselors & TherapistsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Johnson v. McGrewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. MoenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987