Legal Opinion

State v. Moen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1987No. 86-C-20504; CA A39495PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*89WARREN, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of contempt of court for failure to obey a duly served subpoena.1 Defendant’s only contention on appeal is that the trial court’s authority to punish him for contempt is, under the facts, limited to a fine not exceeding $100. We agree and reverse.

On March 16,1986, defendant was served a subpoena to appear before a grand jury on March 20. On March 19,1986, the state obtained a warrant authorizing the search of defendant’s person. On March 20, defendant failed to appear before the grand jury. On that day, an order was issued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. STATE Ex Rel OREGON STATE BAR v. LENSKEOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Spencer v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weldon v. Board of Licensed Professional Counselors & TherapistsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Johnson v. McGrewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. MoenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API