Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Polk

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 27, 1990No. 73842Published

1ConcurrenceMcDONALD, Justice

' The judgment entered for Polk must be vacated. All relevant market factors in existence on the day of the taking should be considered, but this was not allowed in the trial. Polk is entitled only to the fair market value of his plants when taken. Staninger v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority, 182 So.2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). In a normal condemnation proceeding fair market value is defined as what a willing buyer would pay and what a willing seller would accept for the property, neither acting under constraints or duress and both being fully informed. Id. Any buyer of plants is interested…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Plant Board v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Wearly v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. DEPT. OF AGRIC. AND CONSUMER SERV. v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Corneal v. State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Staninger v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API