Legal Opinion

Hafford v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 31, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

Wilmer and Mary Hafford appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) concluding that Maine’s recreational use statute, 14 M.R.S.A. § 159-A (Supp.1995), limits the liability of Great Northern Nekoosa Corporation for injuries Wilmer Hafford suffered on Great Northern’s property. We affirm the judgment.

The Haffords operate an outfitting business called Allagash Outfitters. They rent canoes and camping equipment to people who want to paddle the Allagash Waterway and they sometimes provide transportation for paddlers to the “put-in”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Philbrook v. Gates Formed-Fibre Products, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  2. Robbins v. Great Northern Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kimberly Ann Sallee, Individually and as Next Friend of Lucas Gregory Durkop and Maria Christina Rivera, Matthew James Sallee, and James Allan Sallee v. Matthew R. Stewart and Diana Stewart D/B/A Stewartland HolsteinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Dickinson v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Roeder v. United StatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Thompson v. Kyo-Ya Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kimberly Ann Sallee, Individually and as Next Friend of Lucas Gregory Durkop and Maria Christina Rivera, Matthew James Sallee, and James Allan Sallee v. Matthew R. Stewart and Diana Stewart D/B/A Stewartland HolsteinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API