Legal Opinion

Philbrook v. Gates Formed-Fibre Products, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 3, 1988PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

The plaintiff, Norman Philbrook, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Kennebec County, granting defendant Gates Formed-Fibre’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Philbrook was precluded from suing Gates by the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 39 M.R.S.A. § 1 et seq. (1978 and Supp.1987) (hereinafter “the Act”). We agree with Philbrook that on the record on the motion there remains a genuine factual issue whether that exclusivity provision is here applicable. We therefore vacate the summary judgment.

The facts of this case are as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Levesque v. ShoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Leo v. AMERICAN HOST & DERRICK COMPANYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Rancourt v. Waterville Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. Peoples Heritage Bank v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Currier v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. Onat v. Penobscot Bay Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. Town of Falmouth v. LongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. Hughes v. Beta Upsilon Building Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. Robbins v. Great Northern Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API