Philbrook v. Gates Formed-Fibre Products, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
SCOLNIK, Justice.
The plaintiff, Norman Philbrook, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Kennebec County, granting defendant Gates Formed-Fibre’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Philbrook was precluded from suing Gates by the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 39 M.R.S.A. § 1 et seq. (1978 and Supp.1987) (hereinafter “the Act”). We agree with Philbrook that on the record on the motion there remains a genuine factual issue whether that exclusivity provision is here applicable. We therefore vacate the summary judgment.
The facts of this case are as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Levesque v. ShoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Leo v. AMERICAN HOST & DERRICK COMPANYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Rancourt v. Waterville Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Peoples Heritage Bank v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Currier v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Onat v. Penobscot Bay Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Town of Falmouth v. LongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Hughes v. Beta Upsilon Building Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Robbins v. Great Northern Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.