Legal Opinion

Hoodenpyl v. Guinn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 1934No. 23305PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER. CURIAM.

Defendants in error, who will hereafter be called plaintiffs, filed suit in the lower court to quiet their title to the following described real estate located in McClain county, Okla., to wit: All that portion of the Canadian river bed land which lies below the highwater mark to the thread or center of the stream, and between the adjacent uplands of the parties of the first part in section ten (10), township five (5) north, range two (2) east, and the center or thread of said river at low- water mark, and between the northwest quarter of section ten (10) and the northwest quarter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saxon v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Nelson v. HamraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Martin v. Spaulding Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atteberry v. AulickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Dominic v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Sabin v. Midland Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Page v. Reinauer Bros. Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API