Kinley v. Tennessee State Mutual Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
Plaintiffs were awarded a recovery in the trial court under the windstorm coverage of their homeowner’s policy issued by defendant. The Court of Appeals held that the two witnesses offered as experts to establish that the damage to their home was caused by windstorm, were not qualified, and that without their testimony there was no evidence to support their claim, and the suit was dismissed. We granted a T.R.A.P. Rule 11 appeal to consider the competence of plaintiffs’ witnesses as experts and if incompetent whether dismissal or a new trial was the appropriate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shelby County v. BardenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- West Tennessee Motor Express, Inc. v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
- Alves ex rel. Alves v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. BoggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- Otis v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Airline Construction, Inc. v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Lazy Seven Coal Sales, Inc. v. Stone & Hinds, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- GSB Contractors, Inc. v. HessCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.