United Transportation Union, Local 74 v. Consolidated Rail Corp., United Transportation Union
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
This duty of fair representation case under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., was resolved in favor of defendant United Transportation Union (“UTU”) in a bench trial, following the district court’s grant of UTU’s motion to strike the jury demand made in plaintiff United Transportation Union, Local 74’s (“Local 74”) Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that Local 74 was entitled to the jury trial that it requested. We further hold that there are facts upon which reasonable jurors could conclude both that it would…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Emil B. Bair v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- First W. Bank, Sturgis v. Livestock YardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Beesley v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
- Walton v. Cowin Equipment Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.