Legal Opinion
Fleck v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 30, 1994No. 83502PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STUBBLEFIELD, Judge.
This case was assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Civil Appellate Procedure Rule 1.203(A), 12 O.S.Supp.1993, ch. 15, app. 2, after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action seeking back pay and liquidated damages *534under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. Appellant’s motions for oral argument and briefing are denied. After a review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we reverse and remand with instructions.
On March 17, 1992, Plaintiff David Fleck filed this action against his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lorance v. At&t Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Unexcelled Chemical Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Timothy Alldread v. City of GrenadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fleck v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORR.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Mary C. Griffin v. Dillon Family & Youth Services, Doing Business as Shadow Mountain Institute, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997