Roy Wilson v. A. E. Slayton, Jr., Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Wilson, a Virginia prisoner, attacks the constitutionality of his Virginia recidivist conviction under Va.Code § 53-296. More specifically he argues that the Virginia Recidivist Statute violates such constitutional principles as double jeopardy, due process and equal protection of the law.
Recidivist statutes are a perfectly legitimate subject of legislative regulation, Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554, 87 S.Ct. 648, 17 L.Ed.2d 606 (1967), whose constitutionality is no longer open to challenge. Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 82 S.Ct. 501, 7 L.Ed.2d 446 (1961).
The Supreme Court has held in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Evans v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- William James Rummel v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Brown v. ParrattDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1976
- Ruff v. GathrightDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1974
- William James Rummel v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978