In re Estate of Pearsons
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco making partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. . The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal by Ira Mathewson, Daniel Mathewson, Henry Mathewson, Rhoda Smith, and Lucy A. Angelí from parts of an order of *526partial distribution of the estate of Hiram Arthur Pear-sons, deceased.
Although said deceased left a will, the part of his estate here in question is, for reasons not necessary to be stated, to be distributed as though he had died intestate. His next of kin of equal degree are aunts and uncles, and are the appellants, who are sisters and brothers of the decedent’s mother, Ann Charity Pearsons, and Clarissa P. Wheeler and Lucy A. Valentine, who are sisters of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of KirkendallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Ryan v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Rowley v. StrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Robertson v. BurrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by23 opinions
- Estate of RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gerlach Mercantile Co. v. Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- State v. FourchySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.