Legal Opinion

Cash v. Meisenheimer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1909No. 7819PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Douglas county, Steiner, J., entered October 2, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for damages for breach of contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract of sale of real estate. He recovered a judgment in the court below. Defendant appeals.

The amended complaint alleges, in substance, that the defendant, in 1902, falsely represented that he was a single man and the owner in fee of section 5, township 20, north, range 30, in Douglas county, and thereby induced plaintiff to enter into a contract in writing for the purchase of said land, at the agreed price of $6,440; that certain payments were made on the contract, plaintiff went into possession of the land, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Lent v. B. & M. R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Reynolds v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Texas Co. v. Pensacola Maritime Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  3. Garvey v. BarkleyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Conway v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gottschalk v. MeisenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API