Legal Opinion
MURLIN v. PEARMAN
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 26, 2016No. 113,193PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
{1 The dispositive questions before this court are whether the plaintiff's petition for protective order, filed pursuant to 22 O.S8. Supp.2018 § 60.2, 1 was frivolous and victimless, and whether attorney fees and costs should have been awarded. We hold that the matter was frivolously filed and victimless, and that attorney fees and costs should have been awarded.
FACTS
12 Jimmy Lee Pearman, Jr. and Theresa Marie Pearman filed for divorcee on July 9, 2012, in the District Court of Cleveland County, Oklahoma. The decree dissolving the marriage was memorialized on June 24, 2018, however, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Loffland Bros. Equipment v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vance v. Enogex Gas Gathering, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- LATIGO OIL & GAS v. BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- SHELLEM v. GRUNEWELDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- AUTRY v. ACOSTA, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- KITE v. CULBERTSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.