State v. . Phillips
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Wauker, J.,
after stating the facts: It may be well to state that there is a little confusion in the record as to the exact nature of the application to this Court, on being designated as a petition and the other as a motion; but this is not very material, as it affects only the form and not the substance of the application.
The board of county commissioners designated Henderson as the county in which the defendant should work under the sentence of the court, and he is now performing his work there.
This proceeding for a certiorari, instead of an appeal in the usual way and by the ordinary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daniels v. HomerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- In Re HolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- State v. . BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Williams v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.